Visit our new British Pakistani Christians website

Visit our new British Pakistani Christians website
This site will no longer publish new material. Please join our new website www.britishpakistanichristians.org

Thursday, 14 January 2010

In brief the Blasphemy Laws of Pakistan


During my discussions with Pakistani Christians and other faith representatives, I have come to the knowledge, that few of us truly understand, the individual implications of the Pakistani Blasphemy Laws. To bring a better understanding to the readership of the BPCA blog, I have undertaken a study and write in brief - what I believe are the main points. Several components of the Pakistani Criminal Code comprise its blasphemy laws:

Section 295 forbids damaging or defiling a place of worship or a sacred object;



  • Section 295-A forbids any outrages to religious feelings.

  • Section 295-B forbids desecration of the Quran.

  • Section 295-C forbids defamation of the Prophet Mohammed.

  • Barring 295-C, the provisions of section 295 stipulate that offences are a consequence of intent rather than tangible acts.

  • Desecration of the Quran warrants imprisonment for life.

  • Defaming Prophet Mohammed merits death with or without a fine.

  • If a charge is brought to the authorities under Section 295-C, the trial must take place in a Court of Session with a Muslim judge presiding.

Section 298:



  • Section 298-A prohibits the use of any derogatory remark or representation in respect of Muslim holy personages.

  • Section 298-B and 298-C prohibit the Ahmaddiya from behaving as Muslims behave, calling themselves Muslims, proselytizing, or "in any manner whatsoever" outraging the religious feelings of Muslims.

  • Violation of any part of Section 298 could render the accused liable to imprisonment for up to three years possibly a fine too.


Article 45 of "The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan" (1973) states:


"the President shall have power to grant pardon, reprieve and respite, and to remit, suspend or commute any sentence passed by any court, tribunal or other authority."


Having read through the text of these acts, I outline the alterations the BPCA would espouse to the existing Blasphemy Laws - These alterations would provide better freedoms and equality to minority groups, however, I reiterate that such a proposal is not a primary objective for the BPCA. Moreover this is a first step in our granular approach of tackling the injustices of the Blasphemy Law. Our primary objective is for it's permanent abrogation;


Section 295:



  • Introduce extensions to 295-A to enforce against abuses or outrages to religious feelings of any faith.

  • Extend 295-B to prevent desecration or defilement of any holy texts.

  • Extend 295-C to prevent the defamation of any holy prophet of any faith.

  • Redesign legal practice and definition to restrict arrestable offences to tangible, evidence led breaches.

  • Reduce sentences to a maximum of 6 months with rehabilitation and a range of "Restorative Justice" programs i.e. repainting religious buildings to compensate for the hurt and provocation/incitement.

  • Remove any form of death sentence.

Section 298:



  • Extend existing legislation to afford protection to "Religious Personages"of all faiths.

  • Reduce sentencing to just 6 months and a possible fine - with "Restorative Justice" programs.

  • Remove the highly contentious discriminatory sections 298-B and 298-C entirely.

A provision should also be added that stipulates before cases of Blasphemy Law are implemented, the decisions should be reviewed by a scrutiny panel, to ensure fairness within the decision making process. The panel should consist of representatives of minority faith groups with no restriction on communication with outside media or the Public. Moreover, the President should personally undertake a sampling exercise on the reviews from the Scrutiny panel and actual cases themselves.


The provisions above are suggestions from the BPCA and may or may not make the final submission to the High Commissioner on the issue of the Blasphemy Law. We would invite the comments of those reading this post....?


A copy of the Blasphemy Law can be read (here)


A copy of Section 45 of the 1973 Constitution can be read (here)

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

BPCA leads multi-faith delegation with High Commissioner of Pakistan Wajid Shamsul Hasan

From left to right Alex Chowdhry (Chairman BPCA), Wilson Chowdhry (Vice Chairman 2nd BPCA), Rev Kevin Logan (Parliamentary Candidate Chrsitian Alliance - Accrington), Sukhwant Dhaliwal (Women Against Fundamentalism) Atiq Chowdhry (Vice Chairman 1st BPCA)
Wilson up to his old tricks!

Pastor Kevin Logan with His Excellency Wajid Shamsul Hasan (High Commissioner Pakistan)


Alex Chowdhry, Kevin Logan, His Excellency Wajid Shamsul Hasan, Samia Shabhad (Greenwich Multi-Faith Forum), Atiq Chowdhry, Wilson Chowdhry, Rev Jesse Van der Walk (Greenwich Multi-Faith Forum)

Ranbir Singh (Hindu Human Rights Group), Alex Chowdhry, Kevin Logan, High Commissioner Wajid Shamsul Hasan, Samia Shabad, Mr. M. Nafees Zakaria (political Advisor to HC), Atiq Chowdhry, Rev Jessie Van Der Walk and of course
Wilson Chowdhry


BPCA meeting with Pakistani High Commissioner

Date: Friday 8th January 2010
Time: 4.30pm to 6.30pm
Venue: Pakistani Embassy, 35-36 Lowndes Square, London SW1X 9JN

Attendance: Pakistani High Commissioner (Mr. Wajid Shamsul Hasan) and his political advisor (Mr. M. Nafees Zakaria); Alex Chowdhry Chairman BPCA; Atiq Chowdhry 1st Vice Chairman BPCA; Samia Shabhad and Rev Jessie from Greenwich multi-faith forum; Sukhwant from Women Against Fundamentalism; Rev Kevin Logan Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Christian People's Alliance in Accrington; Pastor Jimmy Robinson from Potters House Christian Fellowship; Ranbir Singh from Hindu Human Rights Group and Wilson Chowdhry Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Green Party.

Agenda:

1. Introductions
2. The Blasphemy Law
3. Parity of educational and employment rights and opportunities in Pakistan
4. Police Reform
5. Reform of Ulema Council
6. Joint electorate
7. Quota system
8. Freedom of religion particularly changing one's religion both here and in Pakistan
9. More accountability and fairness within Asylum Seeker provision in the UK - including better monitoring of deportees

1. Introductions - all introduced themselves

During the round of introductions the High Commission officials expressed their disappointment that BPCA went ahead with a public protest when they had already been offered a meeting with the High Commission to raise these issues. BPCA members challenged this stating that the High Commission offered a meeting ahead of the planned demonstration and then cancelled it. This was clearly a tactic for getting them to call off the demonstration and part of the intention of this meeting was felt to be an attempt at preventing future demonstrations. The high Commissioner also implied that some faiths had been excluded form the delegation. Wilson at this point submitted letters of support from Salim Mulla Leader of the Council of Lancashire Mosques and a letter from Dr Paul Edlin from the Board of Deputies for British Jews – both groups apologised for not being able to make it. They have confirmed an ongoing interest to attend future meetings. Wilson apologised for not being able to get representatives from the smaller faith groups.


2. The Blasphemy Law -
Points made:
Only mosques are currently being protected and BPCA want this extended to cover all other religious institutions. Their impression is that most of the legislation is not specifically about Islam but rather that in its implementation it is only applied to protect Muslims, Muslim institutions and texts.

Particular problem with reference to Prophet Muhammad under the legislation and BPCA suggested that this needs to be extended to cover all religious figures/religious beliefs
The current legislation allows for spreading of rumours to erupt into violence, persecution, arrests and incarceration

Atiq Chowdhry tied this discussion to a demand for greater regulation of the mosque public address systems and highlighted this through an example of the mosque behind his family's house in Faisalabad, which regularly declares that Christians are Khaffirs and encourages people to persecute or kill them.

Welcomed PPP's espoused commitment to tackling the impact of blasphemy law and the appointment of a minority religions officer.
WAF intervened to argue that they are more interested in seeing the abolition of the blasphemy law than its extension in any way, that one can look at the offences against religion chapter of the constitution in two parts: one that is broadly about stemming incitement to hatred against other faiths (a kind of hate crimes legislation) that can be used to deal with attacks on property and another section that is specifically about what is said about Prophet Muhammad. WAF wants to see this latter section abolished and not extended because it is this sort of thing that sanctions rumours and police actions and privileges one religion or religion per se over others.

Wilson highlighted that the BPCA has an ongoing commitment towards the abolishment of the Blasphemy Law, however, due to the repeated statements by the Pakistani Government opposing such a repeal a primary step- compromise was being tabled. The intent being to remove first and second class citizenship and to reduce the level of abuse of the law. his would be espoused by opportunity for reciprocal application of the law to protect people of all faiths.
Wilson made an additional point here on Ahmaddis being criminalised by the current legislation and WAF spoke in support of this point and the need to repeal section 298B+C.
WAF made an additional point on the way in which these legal provisions are being used to specifically oppress women as well as the particular impact of communal violence on women and girls

WAF also recognised that whilst PPP may have offered support for repealing the blasphemy legislation and may have encountered resistance they could still, in the first instance, make procedural arrangements to ensure that there is a judicial inquiry into each claim such that claims can not be lodged until their basis / validity is investigated and this would prevent the great number of false claims. Also pointed out that this and other measures such as repercussions for the lodging of false claims and greater state intervention was attempted under Benazir Bhutto's government and it actually lead to a fall in the number of blasphemy cases. Also suggested pushing for state intervention to stop cases going forward until they can get this section of the law repealed.

The response of the Pakistani High Commissioner and his political assistant -
They are very aware of the impact on religious minorities and indeed there have been moves especially by the PPP to abolish the blasphemy law to no avail. The Pakistani High Commissioner reiterated 'we are there with you on this, we already know this' However, the High Commissioner and particularly his advisor were at times quite defensive, particularly stating that the delegation can highlight issues but should not be getting involved in the business of how the Pakistani state should respond to these matters. Moreover, he emphasised that the current government is a coalition government and that the other partners and not just the PPP need to be pressurised. They were of the view that if we are going to channel our energies into anything then it should be to meet with Nawaz Sharif on his next visit and pressurise him to follow the PPP's lead on this rather than be lobbying the PPP. Also questioned our evidence and wanted us to substantiate the claims we were making. We were able to refer to Human Rights Watch and Amnesty reports as well as media coverage of these issues.

In particular, they suggested that the violence that had so far taken place was not about religion but was rather a social and economic issue about lack of education and also made an attempt to claim that the blasphemy law was not Islamic in nature and this is evidenced by the specific impact upon Muslims. In particular they noted that the main issue in Pakistan at the moment is where many Muslims are killing many other Muslims and that this was not about religious infighting but rather about lack of education.

The entire group believed that there was validity in the comments made regarding the issue of education and cultural norms, which by their very nature involved prejudices and preconceptions – they did not believe this was an excuse for the retention of the existing legal bias. They agreed that through better education misconceptions, stereotypes and unfounded enmity would gradually erode, however this should be in tandem with clear circumscribed equality legislation, Legal safeguards and legal accountability. The delegation was unanimous in their belief that existing legislation was favourable towards those of an Islamic predilection. Moreover Wilson corrected the High Commissioner on his statement that the Blasphemy Law was universally applicable to all faiths, by reminding him that it was only the protections to Islam that held a multilateral status. Other faith prophets, teachings, practices and religious literature were not afforded any form of protection.

Not at all receptive to the question of Ahmaddis and would not enter into discussion on this issue.
They appeared to need convincing to take the delegation seriously and a fair amount of time was spent responding to the Commission's point that we should be equally lobbying other countries especially India because of the violence to religious minorities there and that we should not be telling people in Pakistan how to conduct their affairs because there are already a number of Pakistani civil society groups being consulted by the state. The BPCA argued that wider consultation with external bodies allows for more comprehensive improvement programmes.

The delegation was also challenged on the question of evidence for its claims - why did we think that religious minorities were being persecuted in Pakistan, why did we think that people were incarcerated under false claims/allegations, what evidence did we have to make these suggestions? Moreover, they pointed out that the newly established Constitutional Review Committee had already taken submissions on the question of Blasphemy legislation and that the newly appointed “Minority Affairs Minister” (MAM) Shabhaz Bhatti is a member of the Committee. When the High Commissioner referred to this MAM as Shabhaz Chowdhry Wilson corrected the surname - an error by the High commissioner that highlighted the low regard for minority representatives.

They claimed that a review of the blasphemy law was part of the Constitutional Review Committee's remit and was being looked at particularly this issue of having a judicial inquiry into allegations. They also made some reference to submissions to the committee from Pakistani civil society groups and a passing reference to addressing gender through a review of the Family Law Act.

However they did agree to take a written submission specifically on the Blasphemy Law and after much convincing of the links amongst British Pakistanis with Pakistan, they began to hear the delegation's concerns, they noted these and agreed to feed them back to the Pakistani government and also agreed to meet again in June 2010 to feedback on developments.

They were particularly receptive to points on gender.

They remained unconvinced by concerns raised by Rev Kevin Logan, Pastor Jimmy Robinson and Rev Jesse van der Valk that atrocities in Pakistan were fuelling anti Muslim sentiment in Britain, perpetuating stereotypes of Muslims as intolerant, bolstering BNP support in the UK and creating untoward pressure groups such as “Stop the Islamisation of Europe” - therefore impacting upon the quality of life and perception of British Pakistanis.

The political advisor requested detailed information on blasphemy cases and specifically their names but of course this was challenged and the majority of the delegation stated that names of individual cases would not be passed on.

Action: make a submission on blasphemy law focusing in bringing together existing evidence of its impact.

3. Parity of educational and employment rights and opportunities in Pakistan
Points made:

Christian schools are particularly affected by the de-nationalisation of the education system in Pakistan. Less Christians now attend, much due to inability to afford the national subsidised costs of training. Previously, impoverished Christian families were served by significantly discounted school fees.

Some Christian families are deterred from sending children to the newly nationalised educational establishments. This is a consequence of the nationally adopted Islamic Studies that is deemed to be of a proselytising nature - especially as all schools even formerly Christian schools are now predominantly attended by Muslim children.

Christian organisations in Pakistan have a special place in the history of social provision in Pakistan. Christian Schools from the outset have been of the highest standard and this status is still retained in the modern day.

Wilson noted that whilst 50% of Pakistani's are illiterate, only 7% of Christians are at the same level of education as the average Pakistani.

Wilson ended his point with a call for a basic religious studies course that would enhance community cohesion by teaching similarities between faiths, rather than just differences. Moreover, Wilson suggested that for those that would like to take on graduate or post-graduate faith based training, options for specialisation in other faiths should be provided. The only theological degrees attainable in Pakistan are Islamic based.

Rev Kevin Logan suggested that some type of community bonding course should be introduced to schools Wilson termed it “relationship training”. This could be a primary step in delivering the cultural reforms to the next generation, referred to earlier.

The Pakistani High Commission response:

Initial response was that Christian schools do exist in Pakistan and there is nothing preventing their existence and they would like more concrete evidence on this issue. Indeed given that education was a central concern for the High Commission officials - they seemed to be pointing to many of these issues depending upon better education - there was space to raise this issue through a more detailed written submission.

Pointed out that they were recruiting retired teachers from the UK to up-skill teachers in Pakistan. The BPCA expressed an interest in gaining more information about this. Atiq Chowdhry (a teacher himself) highlighted that retired teachers used archaic practices. Teaching strategies and practices reform frequently in the UK. He suggested, a more sensible way forward, would be to recruit from the new wave of existing teaching professionals using modern didactic process.

High Commissioner referred to the establishment of some kind of interfaith body that is advising on religious education, the curriculum and other interfaith matters. One body has already been initiated in Pakistan and one body is about to start in the UK. The BPCA indicated an interest in being involved.

Action - the High Commission is willing to accept a written submission on this issue particularly one that can point to evidence of the negative impact of de-nationalisation of education upon Christian minorities.


4. Police and Statutory Reform
Points made:

· This followed on from the general points above about the need for greater transparency and accountability
· BPCA stated that people are experiencing problems lodging an FIR and that some people are better placed to get their FIR lodged than others. In Particular the Minorities Affair Minister Shahbaz Bhatti, while other minority MNA’s and other officials, seem to be lacking any empowerment.

Pakistani High Commission were not in agreement on this issue where the Pakistani High Commissioner appeared to be prepared to acknowledge problems with policing and particularly levels of corruption, his political advisor was more defensive. The Advisor informed us that any person could legally request an FIR from the Police. Wilson argued that in practice such statutes held no sway within a corrupted Police Authority, that could be bribed and often held their own prejudices. Wilson suggested increased positive discrimination within police recruitment - in particular, addressing local diversities. Alex Chowdhry highlighted the fact that the Police stood back insouciantly and watched while the atrocities at Gojra, Korian, and Sumbrial took place.

The advisor noted that a previous set of reforms lead to a series of clashes between the Law Courts and the previous dictatorship’s oppressive regime. This linked to the eventual suspension of the judiciary. It would seem however; that the reforms are back in progress and the High Commissioner believed that time would bring these reforms to fruition. All agreed that circumscribed reforms of the Policing and statutory bodies such as courts, local government agencies etc, is a high priority. This should include specific, concise Legal safeguards to prevent existing corruption and abuse.


5. Reform of Ulema Council
Points made:

Alex Chowdhry referred to the need for better regulation of Muslim clerics and what they were permitted to speak from Mosque public address systems. He advised that much of the recent clashes could have been resolved by early Police intervention and restrictions placed on loudspeaker announcements. The deplorable activities of the local Imams resulted in the mass incitement to violence.

High Commissioners Response:

The High Commissioner confirmed that a regulatory body already exists – later clarifying that it was more of a consultative group. He agreed that the local religious fervour and intolerance that resulted in the attacks on Christian villages in recent times, was amplified by the actions of the mosque clerics. He informed us that he would take up our comments with the Government of Pakistan and the consultative group.

6. Joint Electorate
Points made:

Alex raised the demand to scrap the current system that allows Christians two votes and all others one vote. He is of the view that a system which encourages Christians to vote for two separate candidates - one of a mainstream party and one for a specifically minority religious seat - is letting other mainstream political parties off the hook when it comes to representing minority groups in Pakistan. He explained that those quota system politicians are in any case given very limited space to manoeuvre and little credence within their; communities, respective political parties or other spheres. He therefore recommended, that this system, ought to be replaced with a one vote for all electoral system, that holds all politicians responsible for protecting and representing minorities in the country. This system would be akin to the electoral system in Britain where each mainstream political party fields its own minority candidates through ethnic minority or women's lists.

High Commissioners response;

The Pakistani High Commission noted this point and agreed to feed this back. Their only comment on this item was that the PPP has seven minority candidates and that a Minority Affairs Minister is in place.


7. Quota System –
Points raised:

Wilson spoke on this issue and argued that the quota system of employment needed to be extended to ensure more senior positions became available to minority recruits. Christians and other minorities continue to be concentrated in the lower socio economic rungs and lower civil service positions. Wilson also suggested that an appropriately monitored and audited census be taken. He requested that researchers should include a significant proportion of minority representatives, to reduce abuses of the data collection system. The BPCA believed that existing data on the percentages of minority groups was skewered, archaic and fallible at best. Such information has been used by previous governments for their own; personal devices, to gain advantage and often to subjugate minorities during periods of significant increased intolerance. It is purported by Christian Bishops of Pakistan that Pakistani Christians account for 13% of the total population of Pakistan. The BPCA believes the figure to be closer to between 8-10% of the overall general population.

High Commissioners response;

The Pakistani High Commission's response to this was that the Pakistani Government have just appointed a Christian Chief Justice, there has been an increase in the number of minority seats in Parliament and the recent appointment of a Minister specifically responsible for minority rights. Wilson questioned him on this and asked whether these were token gestures, a perfunctory response to ostensibly exhibit best behaviour? Wilson proposed that the High Commission should relay a request that effective correlation of roles provided with respect to a meritocratic process, should be evaluated and recorded in a palpable report. It is essential that recruitment should not be based on rudimentary roles to fulfil a lowest common denominator process.

The High Commission officials also stated that a lot of money had recently been invested in the quota system via employment but Alex pushed for more information about the timescales - how would this money be spent, what is the timetable for implementation, how has this commitment been progressed? The Political Advisor seemed to be suggesting that this policy had already been signed off and implemented. When BPCA suggested the need for a more detailed and up to date Census of the population of Pakistan they were criticised by the High Commission officials for going too far into micro management of internal Pakistani affairs. Pastor Jimmy Robinson reiterated the need for tangible evidence for Quota implementation. He remarked on the continual efforts to circumnavigate discussion by derailing the agenda. The High Commissioner then stated that the Quota process had been initiated.

8. Freedom of religion particularly changing one's religion both here and in Pakistan-
Points raised:

Some of this issue was addressed in the discussion on blasphemy and insults to Prophet Muhammad. Particular points were made about the persecution of converts away from Islam and the forced conversion of minorities to Islam. Moreover, although rarely implemented an Apostasy Law exists in Pakistan and it was felt that this should be repealed. Wilson raised issues regarding the NWF provinces but the groups decided to drop this subject, as it would be too large an issue for this early stage meeting.

High Commissioners response:

The High Commission did not appear to be taking this point seriously and in particular claimed that Pakistan comprises a high number of converts to Christianity that live very safely in the country. It is important to note that an intervention on the particular impact of conversion on women (reports of forced abductions of Hindu/Christian women for instance) were taken far more seriously by the High Commission officials and meant they were far less dismissive of this point.


9. Asylum seekers
BPCA made the point that they want to see better protection of asylum seekers that are returned to Pakistan.

The High Commission officials did not seem willing to discuss this point at all and questioned the suggestion that deportees are at risk on return to Pakistan and indeed suggested that people were making false claims about Pakistan. Wilson informed the High Commissioned that he is in correspondence with a failed asylum seeker who had returned to persecution after fleeing the country. The deported individual is now seeking Asylum in another country. The Pakistani High Commission questioned the veracity of this statement. Wilson explained that for the correspondent’s safety it would not be possible to divulge personal details, however he would try to seek permission from his correspondent.

Action: Wilson has agreed to obtain feedback from aid bodies such as “Release International” to substantiate the return of deportees into a quagmire of persecution.

10. Any Other Business:

Religious identity in passports: Raised by Atiq as exposing minorities to discrimination and harassment and demand that religious identity should not need to be listed in the passport. High Commission agreed to look into the matter and explained this would be a constitutional change that if ratified, would take time to implement.

Next meeting:
The High Commission officials agreed to feed back points of the meeting to the Pakistani government and to accept two written submissions - one on the blasphemy law and one on the impact of de-nationalisation of education on Christians. A follow up meeting was agreed for June 2010 – Wilson to be responsible for securing dates.
At the end of the meeting Rev Kevin Logan thanked the High Commissioner for his time and patience and commended him on being willing to discuss our difficult topics.
Alex thanked the High Commissioner for his exhibited committment to affect change in the qulaity of life for Minorities in Pakistan.
Wilson thanked the High Commissioner for his time, patience and in particular for the police protection that kept our churches safe, during the recent Taliban Christmas telephone threat.

Monday, 11 January 2010

BPCA audience with Green Party's Jean Lambert MEP for London

From left to right Gerald Sunny, MEP Jean Lambert, Dr Mujeeb Chowdhry, Wilson Chowdhry (Alex Chowdhry taking photograph).


Ratified minutes for our meeting with Jean Lambert MEP (South Asian delegate for the European Union) - 18th December 2009. See previous report (here)
The Blasphemy Law:

Alex Chowdhry led with a brief introduction to the Blasphemy Law, Jean was familiar with this piece of Pakistani legislation. Jean was aware of our petition for the either the universal application of the Blasphemy Law to provide protection to people of all faiths or for its abrogation in its entirety. Jean agreed to take this up with the new Pakistani Ambassador to the EU who had only been in place for 4 days. Jean also advised that the European Parliament has passed resolutions which have raised the question of freedom of belief in Pakistan.

Statutory Reforms (Police and Council)

We moved onto the subject of statutory sector reform within the Pakistani context esp. the way in which the Police Force and local Councils interact with the Christian minority. Alex Chowdhry explained why it is important that the Punjab Provincial Assembly particularly be held accountable for the atrocities against Christians for their failure to proactively work against this form of discrimination within their Province quoting major incidents such as; Gojra, Sumbrial and Korian. Alex Chowdhry also gave a brief explanation of the Federal and Provincial structure within Pakistan and the need for work both with the Federal and Provincial structure of government.

Wilson believed the quotient of minority employees in the Police and local, provincial and National level is below what it should be. Wilson suggested that a regulatory body consisting of an appropriate level of empowered minority members could induce more effective and valid decisions within the investigation of blasphemy allegations. Wilson also suggested that any failure to meet an appropriate standard or practice, within the investigation blasphemy incidents and other crimes, should be met with stiffer disciplinary practice – to deter the high level of abuse or insouciance in recent times.

Jean Lambert informed us that this could be tied to funding currently being given to the Pakistani authorities - use of EU monies to help support the development of independent and effective civil institutions, such as the police and judiciary. The person responsible for this would be Baroness (Cathy) Ashton: she is the new so-called High Representative for Foreign Affairs of the EU and also a member of the European Commission. We are actively seeking an audience with Baroness Ashton.

Reform of the Ulema Council:

Alex Chowdhry queried the impunity of the Ulema Council. Too often in Pakistan rumour is being cascaded amongst local populaces via the public address systems on Mosques. Alex suggested that some measures be taken to restrict the level of output from such public addresses, especially those that could be incite communities leading to the civilian attacks such as the one at Gojra.

Wilson suggested that a regulatory body and some legislation be introduced to prevent such abuses. He also suggested that the government work with Mosque organisations to set up an appropriate code of conduct.

Joint Electorate:

The conversation then moved onto the joint electorate system and possible ways of reforming this for the benefit of Pakistani minorities.

Alex suggested that political parties become responsible for the selection of their own minority candidates, in juxtaposition to the existing protected national quotas for minorities. The basis for his premise was the lack of empowerment or influence mandatory positions, hold for those elected in this fashion.

Wilson suggested increasing of the percentage of minority candidates by undertaking an uncorrupted census. Figures regarding the actual demographics of minority communities in Pakistan are limited, archaic, vary and believed to be incorrect.

All agreed a review of the existing census information was imperative this would allow correct allocation of recently ratified, positive discrimination objectives.

Wilson queried the existing census process. He intimated a wish that minority groups and paid minority employees be utilised within the data retrieval and planning process.

Quota System:

This led on to a further discussion of the quota system that had been announced by the Pakistani Government for jobs within the statutory sector. Particularly what evidence could be garnered about the numbers of roles that would be in senior positions within those institutions? All agreed that data on applications and success rates should be extrapolated and plotted to ensure that the process was fair. Accountability and traceability were key topics of this discussion.

Educational and Employment Reform

Discussion developed around the field of education particularly as this was a high international priority. Wilson also asked that the level of literacy in Pakistan be tackled in a more substantial way. The fact that over 50% of Pakistanis are illiterate and only 7% of Christians in Pakistan meet the minimum standard, is a poor indictment of the emphasis that education is given in Pakistan.

Jean explained that the EU had already endorsed a package of benefits to the Pakistani Government for the improvement of education.

Wilson was concerned at the potential misdirection of funds and asked that strong auditing practices measuring accountability and traceability be introduced. Moreover that minority groups in Pakistan be involved in the audit trail.

Dr Mujeeb Chowdhry made some helpful contributions to the discussion within the field of education. He raised concern about the nationalisation of formerly Christian Schools. This process had eradicated many of the significant discounts that were given to the poor Christian minorities. Could nationalised funding not continue without the removal of this much needed flexibility?

Dr Mujeeb Chowdhry also suggested that the Government funding be allocated towards the introduction of Christian theology qualifications. This provide an alternative or an addition to the existing undergraduate and post graduate courses in Islamic theology.

Wilson Chowdhry commented on the compulsory Islamic education already taught within schools and colleges and suggested that this be removed for a more universal, broader Religious Education. This would provide an opportunity for people to understand the similarities between faiths and not just the differences. Moreover there are many Minority faith parents who refuse to send their children to schools due to imposition of Islamic studies, in the Christian community of Pakistan this has led to only a 7% of literacy within our faith group.

Wilson also suggested that better information on employment rights be shared with all communities. Minority faith groups and Muslims are all subjected to the worst possible conditions. More fervent regulatory action is required with stiffer penalties for breaches of the law, if we are to reduce abuses.

Asylum Seeker provisions in the UK:

Gerald Sunny asked for more accountability and fairness within the Asylum Seeker provision in the UK. He felt that the British Government did not pace an appropriate level of priority on cases resulting from religious persecution. The intensity of violence and abuse on minority groups is increasing. Yet those who manage to escape to the safety receive no succour and are sent back into a dangerous environment. Many chose to take their own lives others have been killed in acts of vengeance.

Wilson suggested that a process of engagement with Pakistan’s government or the concerned individuals should ensue. This would provide a level of safety to those deported, instigate better protection practices from the Government. If nothing else, such research would at least, provide effective monitoring data regarding the validity of the decision to decline the original asylum application.

Jean agreed that a process of evaluating the safety of deportees would be a useful tool and that the protection of "all it’s people" a priority for all Nation states. She agreed to discuss this at her next meeting at the EU.

Freedom of Religion or no religion:

Finally there was some discussion of the persecution faced by those who had left Islam to become Christians and the lack of protection afforded them by the government especially as freedom of religion is something enshrined within the Constitution and the UN Declaration of Human Rights which Pakistan has signed up to. The existing Apostasy Law in Pakistan prevents such freedom and although not often used communities, take their own action against those who convert. Statutory authorities are slow or reticent to react to use incidents.

Additionally Alex Chowdhry also raised the persecution faced by Muslims who converted to Christianity within the British context. He asked that a Europe-wide agenda based on consultation with all faiths or those with no faith, be adopted to improve the conditions of these vulnerable people.

Friday, 8 January 2010

Our thanks to the Board of Deputies for British Jews.


Dear all,

keep us in your prayers toady as a multi-faith delegation meets with the High Commissioner of Pakistan today. The Board of Directors of British Jews had been invited to attend but could not make the meeting due to their preservation of the Holy Sabbath. They have kindly sent a letter of support which has been emailed to us and to the High Commissioner.

We look forward to a follow up meeting, set on a date when our Jewish brothers can sit alongside us.

Read the letter (here)


Brother Samson Sharaf in Pakistan is leading the way in his involvement with other faith groups in Pakistan. Here in the UK we believe for the first time our community is recognising that we all have an individual part to play in the peace within our societies. Working with wider groups should not just be for our own benefit or for that group or its community. Our efforts for peace, unity, equality and justice should be a holistic effort that benefits all.
Hey it's what God would want "Love thy brother"....Remember....?!

Tuesday, 5 January 2010

Good news from Canada - ICV saves a family!

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

After many years of untiring efforts of International Christian Voice (ICV) and One Free World, Neha and her family were able to come to Canada on December 11, 2009. They are now starting their new life in Canada without fear and suffering.

Brief History of Neha’s Case:

A 2 ½ years old Christian girl named Neha, was raped by Abid Hussein, on 6th April, 2004 at 2:00 pm, Shamsi Dairy Farm, village Terrg Rore Rahwali, Distt. Gujranwala.According to the facts stated by Munir Masih (Neha’s father) to International Christian Voice; Sajjida Munir (Neha’s mother) was not at home and Neha’s father was working in the Shamsi Dairy Farm, near his house, cutting fodder. Culprit Abid Hussein also worked in Shamsi Dairy Farm and several times asked Munir to embrace Islam. On Munirs’ refusal, Abid got enraged and one day finding Munir Masih children alone at home took Neha into the field and raped her. Sajjida and Munir later found Neha in an unconscious state and bleeding profusely near a pond of Dairy Farm and took her to the Civil Hospital Gujranwala.

Neha and her family are now in their new home in Toronto, arranged by International Christian Voice

APMA’S ROLE:

Munir Masih contacted All Pakistan Minorities Alliance (APMA) at the local chapter at Gujranwala through local Christians and requested for help.

REGISTRATION OF CASE:

· Case was registered against the culprit with the help of APMA, under hudood ordinance 10- 7/79 FIR. No. 186/2004 registered in the Cantt police station Gujanwala.
· The local Christian Community along with APMA protested on the negligence of authorities on which, Cantt Police Station arrested culprit Abid Hussein s/o Mohamad Asharaf, under section 110-10/ 7/ 79 and sent him to district jail Gujaranwala.

ADVOCACY AND MEDIA CAMPAIGN

· APMA wrote letters to the higher government authorities and launched a campaign for the justice in this case.
· Minority members of Provincial Assembly of Punjab on behalf of APMA raised this issue in the Punjab Assembly.
· The case was highlighted in the media and APMA held many press conferences to get the attention of the government high authorities.
· APMA campaigned on this case and compelled the provincial government of Punjab to take notice of this case and that Chief Minister Punjab, Chaudhry Pervez Elahi issued a public statement on June 26 2004, condemning the rape of Neha. He also announced 100,000 rupees, (1700 US dollars approximately) for support to the victims family.

MEDICAL AID

· After giving Neha first aid in local hospital at Gujranwala, APMA took her for proper and further treatment. Several surgeries are done and all medical expenditures were looked after by

APMA.

· Doctors apprehend that Neha might never be able to conceive a child as her internal soft organs are damaged.

RELOCATION

· Due to threats from the culprit and Neha’s medical situation, APMA shifted Neha and her family to another city.
· All the needs of Neha’s family were fulfilled and continuous monthly support was given to Neha and her family.

LEGAL AID

· APMA provided free legal aid and hired competent lawyers to pursue the case in the court. These lawyers fought a long legal battle to receive justice. The APMA team was deputed to attend every court hearing along with lawyers.

COURT DECISION:

· Mr. Nazir Ahmed Gajana, who sentenced Abid Hussein to life imprisonment on charges of abduction and 25 years imprisonment for the rape of a minor girl on 23rd January 2006. The culprit has remitted to central jail Gujranwala to serve the two sentences that shall run concurrently. This is a victory of truth and the result of many prayers offered by Christian brothers and sisters for Neha, even though the culprit’s family threatened the victim family and APMA members during the proceeding of the case and tried to bribe the Judge of the court. After the punishment, the culprit’s family threatened Munir Masih for dire consequences. The victim family was still under threat from the day this incident took place. Neha and her family was looking for a safe and comfortable environment where they can live their life without fear and insecurity.

ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN VOICE (ICV)

· Since this incident took place Mr. Peter Bhatti, Chairman International Christian Voice and other ICV members have continuously been in contact with the victim family; giving them moral support, encouragement and trying to bring them to Canada.
· International Christian Voice also contacted many Canadian members of Parliament and Canadian Human Rights Organizations to bring the family to Canada and shared with them injustices that were being done to the victim family.
· International Christian Voice (ICV) requested One Free World International to assist in the immigration process to bring Neha’s family to Canada.
· International Christian Voice arranged traveling documents and the safe exit of the Neha's family from Pakistan.
· International Christian Voice took responsibility of the Neha's family, providing them with food, housing, clothing, and other needs in their settlement in Canada.

International Christian Voice and the Canadian Pakistani Christian community would like to thank Honourable Minister Jason Kenny for issuing a special ministerial permit to Neha and her family. ICV also would like to thank President of One Free World International, Rev. Majeed El Shafie for helping this family with their immigration matters and Pastor Stephen Long from Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship Church for assisting the family with their traveling expenses.

ICV would also like to thank Evangelical Asian Church in helping ICV in the settlement of Neha’s family in Canada. Please pray for Neha and her family, that they will be able to start a new life in Canada without any fear pain and suffering. Also please pray for their settlement and adjustment in this new society so that they will be able to make a difference in the development and progress of our loving country Canada.

If you have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate to contact us. Blessing,
International Christian Voice (ICV)

Tuesday, 29 December 2009

Others join our clamour!

News of our protest March stimulated a mixed response in the Lancashire Guardian. As a result of this local faith groups in the area held a united peace vigil. Read more (here)

We are having great impact in getting others to join with us in a united protest against the current situation in Pakistan. Please do continue to be faithful to the cause.